Parliament Website

Regulation Of Black Taxis And Minicabs

EDM number 587 in 2016-17, proposed by Kate Hoey on 24/10/2016.
Categorised under the topics of Roads and Service industries.

That this House is concerned that companies such as Uber, that use smartphone apps, continue to entrench their market position while routinely flouting the law governing the taxi and mincab industry; welcomes Mayor Sadiq Khan and Transport for London's position that a statutory definition of plying for hire is needed to remove ambiguity and clearly define the difference between taxi and private hire services; agrees that such a definition is necessary to provide passengers with important safety protections against unregulated drivers; believes that in the absence of a statutory definition of plying for hire, public confidence in a safe and secure licensing regime will be undermined and will ultimately undermine the viability of the current taxi service; and calls on the Government to bring forward legislation which provides a clear statutory definition of plying for hire to protect the distinction between taxis and private hire vehicles.

This motion has been signed by a total of 14 MPs.

MPDateConstituencyPartyType
Kate Hoey24/10/2016VauxhallLabourProposed
Ian Mearns24/10/2016GatesheadLabourSeconded
Wes Streeting24/10/2016Ilford NorthLabourSeconded
Jim Cunningham25/10/2016Coventry SouthLabourSeconded
Gavin Robinson25/10/2016Belfast EastDUPSeconded
Kelvin Hopkins26/10/2016Luton NorthLabourSeconded
Dennis Skinner26/10/2016BolsoverLabourSigned
Alan Meale26/10/2016MansfieldLabourSigned
Roger Godsiff26/10/2016Birmingham, Hall GreenLabourSigned
Chris Stephens26/10/2016Glasgow South WestScottish National PartySigned
Chris Matheson27/10/2016City of ChesterLabourSigned
Caroline Lucas16/11/2016Brighton, PavilionGreenSigned
Andrew Rosindell22/11/2016RomfordConservativeSigned
Clive Efford08/03/2017ElthamLabourSigned

Download raw data as csv or xml.