Tribalism In The House Of Commons
EDM number 1792 in 2010-12, proposed by John Pugh on 11/05/2011.
Categorised under the topics of House of Commons and Parliamentary procedure.
That this House notes that the success of any non-Government or Opposition amendment to proposed legislation, if pressed to a vote, is regarded as a likely occasion for lamentation, gnashing of teeth and media glee, and that this applies even if the amendment is constructive and consistent with the aims of the legislation; and further notes that this attitude contrasts with the excellent initiatives on backbench business, makes scrutiny a more futile process, leads not to the sovereignty of parliament but the sovereignty of the Queen's ministers, and accentuates the pointless tribalism that sadly still characterises a parliament without a majority party.
This motion has been signed by a total of 6 MPs.
MP | Date | Constituency | Party | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
John Pugh | 11/05/2011 | Southport | Liberal Democrat | Proposed |
Mark Durkan | 11/05/2011 | Foyle | Social Democratic and Labour Party | Seconded |
Andrew George | 12/05/2011 | St Ives | Liberal Democrat | Seconded |
Stephen Williams | 12/05/2011 | Bristol West | Liberal Democrat | Seconded |
John Leech | 12/05/2011 | Manchester, Withington | Liberal Democrat | Seconded |
Mike Hancock | 17/05/2011 | Portsmouth South | Liberal Democrat | Seconded |
Download raw data as csv or xml.